July 21, 2025

SOC 2 vs ISO 27001: Selecting the Appropriate Cybersecurity Standard

Introduction

Implementing a robust cybersecurity program often involves choosing between established frameworks. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 both aim to protect data and processes, but they differ in structure, scope, and certification approach. Selecting the right standard depends on your organization’s objectives, client requirements, and geographic focus.

Framework Overviews
SOC 2

SOC 2 is an attestation standard defined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It evaluates controls against the Trust Services Criteria:

  • Security (mandatory)
  • Availability (optional)
  • Processing Integrity (optional)
  • Confidentiality (optional)
  • Privacy (optional)

An independent auditor issues a report expressing an opinion on how effectively these controls meet the criteria.

ISO 27001

ISO 27001 is an international certification administered by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It specifies requirements for an Information Security Management System (ISMS) and mandates a prescribed set of controls and documentation. Organizations must demonstrate compliance through an on-site audit to receive formal certification.

Key Differences: Attestation vs Certification
  • SOC 2 produces an attestation report.
      Companies can obtain a SOC 2 attestation regardless of program maturity; the auditor’s opinion may highlight gaps.
  • ISO 27001 grants a formal certification only after full compliance with its standards.
      Failure to meet any requirement prevents certification.
Choosing the Right Framework
  • For US-Based Clients
      SOC 2 is widely recognized in North American B2B sectors, especially SaaS, fintech, and healthcare. Many US customers expect SOC 2 compliance.
  • For International Clients
      ISO 27001 is a global benchmark, often required by partners in Europe, Asia, and industries like manufacturing and finance.
  • Pursuing Both
      Organizations with diverse markets may maintain both standards to demonstrate comprehensive security practices worldwide.
Cost Considerations
SOC 2 Compliance
  • Type 1 Audit: $10K–$20K for a point-in-time evaluation.
  • Type 2 Audit: $20K–$30K+ for a 6–12 month review period.
  • Preparation effort often exceeds audit fees.
      Tailoring scope to relevant Trust Services Criteria can help manage costs.
ISO 27001 Certification
  • Certification typically ranges from $30K to $100K, driven by documentation requirements and audit duration.
  • Requires annual internal audits and a full recertification every three years.
Ongoing Maintenance
  • SOC 2: Annual audits to maintain attestation.
  • ISO 27001: Internal reviews and periodic recertification.
Approach and Scope
  • Customization vs Prescriptiveness
      SOC 2 allows organizations to select applicable criteria and design controls.
      ISO 27001 enforces a fixed set of controls and detailed procedural documentation.
  • Audit Format
      SOC 2 audits can be conducted virtually, while ISO 27001 emphasizes in-person assessment, especially for on-premises environments.
Overlap and Cross-Certification

Although the control objectives overlap, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are not interchangeable.
An ISO 27001-certified organization typically has a smoother path to SOC 2 attestation, but direct mapping of every control is not guaranteed.

Benefits of Dual Compliance
  • Expanded Market Reach
      Access both US-driven SOC 2 markets and internationally focused ISO 27001 opportunities.
  • Enhanced Credibility
      Dual certification signals a strong, organization-wide commitment to security.
  • Streamlined Processes
      Shared documentation and controls reduce incremental audit effort when pursuing the second standard.
Common Audit Challenges
SOC 2
  • Lack of documented evidence for security controls.
  • Inconsistent organizational security culture.
  • Underestimating the preparation timeline, especially for Type 2 audits.
ISO 27001
  • High volume of required policies and procedures.
  • Comprehensive risk assessment and management obligations.
  • Significant resource allocation for implementation and ongoing maintenance.
Decision Guidance

The primary selection criterion is customer geography: SOC 2 tends to drive sales in the US, while ISO 27001 facilitates international business. Organizations operating across both regions often adopt both standards to meet diverse client demands.

Conclusion

Whether you choose SOC 2, ISO 27001, or both, implementing these frameworks strengthens your security posture, safeguards stakeholder data, and enhances competitive positioning in your target markets.

Other blog