DORA compliance
June 24, 2025

Harmonizing Cybersecurity Directives: NIS2 and DORA in Practice

The European Union’s cybersecurity landscape is shaped by several interlocking regulations. Two key pillars are the NIS2 Directive, which sets a broad baseline for critical and important sectors, and DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act), a specialized framework for financial entities. In this article, an ADVsec employee unpacks the similarities, differences, and practical steps to comply with both mandates.

Introduction

The European Union’s cybersecurity landscape is shaped by several interlocking regulations. Two key pillars are the NIS2 Directive, which sets a broad baseline for critical and important sectors, and DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act), a specialized framework for financial entities. In this article, an ADVsec employee unpacks the similarities, differences, and practical steps to comply with both mandates.

1. Regulatory Scope and Objectives
1.1 NIS2 Directive at a Glance
  • Applies to a wide range of sectors: energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, public administration, and financial services.
  • Requires member states to categorize entities as "essential" or "important", with tailored notification and reporting obligations.
  • Transposed into national law; flexibility in implementation leads to potential variance across borders.
1.2 DORA Framework Essentials
  • Directly applicable regulation (no national transposition needed).
  • Targets all financial players: banks, insurance firms, crypto exchanges, payment services, pension funds, and others.
  • Introduces oversight of critical ICT service providers designated by EU authorities (ECB, ESMA, EIOPA).
  • Mandates robust digital resilience measures, including contractual clauses, incident reporting, and ICT risk management.
2. Key Differences and Overlaps

Aspect NIS2 Directive DORA Regulation
Legal Form Directive (needs transposition) Regulation (direct applicability)
Sector Coverage Broad cross-sector Financial sector specific
Supervision National cybersecurity authorities National financial regulators + EU oversight
ICT Service Providers No specific regime Supervision of "critical providers"
Timeline for Compliance 1 year after notification By 17 January 2025

Overlap Consideration: When both apply (e.g., a major bank), DORA’s requirements take precedence for stricter controls. NIS2 fills gaps where DORA is silent or less prescriptive.

3. Practical Compliance Scenario

Case Study: A European payment processor failed to include mandatory vendor contract clauses required by DORA. During an audit, the national regulator flagged missing SLA definitions for incident reporting and risk assessments. As a result, the processor faced a corrective order and reputational damage.

Preventive Measures:

  • Contract Checklist:   1. Define response times and escalation paths for cyber incidents.   2. Include periodic risk review obligations.   3. Specify data protection and confidentiality clauses aligning with DORA’s ICT standards.   4. Agree on audit rights and reporting formats.
  • Governance Tips:
  • Assign a dedicated compliance lead to track regulatory updates.
  • Schedule quarterly vendor reviews to ensure contract adherence.
4. Step-by-Step Implementation Roadmap
  1. Map Applicable Requirements    - Catalogue activities under NIS2 and DORA.    - Determine entity categorization (essential vs. important).
  2. Conduct a Gap Analysis    - Compare current controls against ISO 27001 and DORA’s regulatory technical standards.    - Document missing controls in a GAP register.
  3. Update Policies and Procedures    - Draft or revise incident response plans to satisfy dual reporting channels.    - Align risk management frameworks with both NIS2 and DORA expectations.
  4. Strengthen Supplier Management    - Screen ICT providers for critical designation criteria.    - Embed DORA-specific clauses and NIS2 notification triggers in all procurement contracts.
  5. Training and Awareness    - Run targeted workshops for IT, legal, and management teams.    - Develop quick-reference guides for incident escalation under each framework.
  6. Continuous Monitoring and Audit    - Deploy automated tools for threat detection and network observability.    - Schedule internal audits ahead of official supervisory visits.
5. Enforcement and Penalties
5.1 NIS2 Sanctions
  • Fines: Up to €10 million or 2% of global turnover for essential entities; lower thresholds for important ones.
  • Corrective Measures: Suspension of operations, mandated remedial actions.
5.2 DORA Penalties
  • Financial Sanctions: Up to 1% of average daily turnover per day of non-compliance (capped at 6 months) for designated ICT providers.
  • Supervisory Actions: On-site inspections, binding orders to cease non-compliant activities.
6. ADVsec’s Advisory Blueprint

As an ADVsec consultancy, we offer a holistic approach:

  • Regulatory Impact Assessment: Tailored analysis of NIS2 vs. DORA obligations.
  • Gap Analysis & Roadmap: Clear timelines, responsibilities, and resource plans.
  • Policy and Contract Drafting: Ready-made templates aligned with technical standards.
  • Training Programs: Role-based sessions for cybersecurity and legal teams.
  • Ongoing Assurance: Periodic health checks and simulation exercises.

Conclusion

Aligning the broad, cross-sector NIS2 Directive with the focused, finance-centered DORA Regulation can be challenging—but also an opportunity to elevate your organization’s cyber resilience. By adopting a structured roadmap, engaging vendors proactively, and partnering with ADVsec, entities can avoid costly penalties and build robust defenses against evolving threats.

For more information or to schedule a consultation, contact ADVsec’s cybersecurity experts.

Other blog